Prolific Purveyor of Plonk: Part 2

For me, one of the highlights of 2014 was attending Rudy Kurniawan’s sentencing hearing. Kurniawan had become larger than life, rocketing to stardom in the rare and fine wine world (see my first post for details). At the hearing, though, the illustrious Dr. Conti, wizard of wine and bilker of billionaires, was as unassuming as a petty thief. I guess the prospect of going to prison for a long time is kind of sobering.

Kurniawan had been convicted of mail and wire fraud in connection with the sale of counterfeit wine. Last month, his attorney filed an appeal alleging that (1) the FBI’s searches of Kurniawan’s home violated the Fourth Amendment, (2) the events alleged in Count One of the indictment (some of them time-barred) were improperly joined, and (3) it was unfair to use only the price paid by Kurniawan’s victims (as opposed to the impact of the price on these wealthy individuals) in establishing a sentencing guideline. 

Read More

99 Bottles of Plonk on the Wall

When California wine collector and dealer Rudy Kurniawan was convicted of fraud in December 2013, the details of his elaborate scheme sent shock waves through the wine world. At last, a jury had confirmed what some in the industry had known for years: Kurniawan was a con artist whose too-good-to-be-true wines were in fact counterfeit. He was, as Assistant U.S. Attorney Stanley J. Okula, Jr., put it, a "prolific purveyor of plonk."

Kurniawan was sentenced on Thursday, August 7, to ten years in prison. In addition, he was ordered to forfeit (to give up as a penalty) $20 million worth of property and pay $28,405,502.50 in restitution to seven of his victims. I was fortunate to be able to attend the sentencing hearing. As I listened to the arguments from each side, I realized that this case was a legal smorgasbord and that I could use Kurniawan’s story to answer that frequently asked question, “What does law have to do with wine?”

Read More